So what can the Premier League Study from the NHL?

April 13, 2021 Business  No comments

Do you think Premier Little league footballers get paid too much? Do you think the Premier Little league is becoming less competitive and more predictable? Do you believe there to be an escalating void between the few elite teams that challenge for honours every season and those teams to whom the very idea of challenging for a trophy is only comprehendible in their wildest dreams? If you’ve answered yes to any of the above questions then read on as i present a careful review of the Barclays Premier Little league and compare its conduct and practices to those of the well known Us competition, the National Hockey Little league (or simply, the NHL).

The NHL introduced a general salary cap across the little league in 2005. This means that a pre-determined figure is announced at the beginning of the new season dictating a budget to which all teams must adhere. The cap figure changes annually because it is calculated based on the revenue of the NHL from the previous season. The salary cap consists of two main elements, a “ceiling” and a “floor” — the threshold is the name fond of the most figure that teams are permitted to spend collectively on player wages and it must be strictly abided by, a floor is the name fond of the minimum figure that teams must be paying for collective wages.

OK, first got it so far?

The salary cap system was introduced as an easy way of controlling potential rising player salaries, and as stated the cap has the ability to go up and down from year to year depending on the strengths of NHL revenue channels. It is suggested that it promotes fairness by ensuring that NHL revenues are spread equally amongst all teams, which — theoretically, at least — gives a level playing field for every team across the little league, from the monumentally rich to the smaller-market franchises. Manufactured to eradicate the notion of one particularly wealthy franchise from buying a team of superstars and leaving others in their awaken, this very idea will no doubt make Manchester City and Chelsea fans sick to the stomach.

So what does any of this are related with football and the Premier Little league? Good question. In the seven NHL months since the introduction of the salary cap, hockey fans have witnessed seven different teams crowned Stanley Cup Winners. Compare this to the fact that in the entire 20 year history of the Premier Little league only FIVE different teams have won the Champion. It is obvious to see which of these two establishments markets a more competitive product. 7m

The idea of a different team winning the Premier Little league title every season is perfectly uncommon, and of course the elite fraction would be completely against such system as it would endanger their status within the game and their capacity to produce periods of sustained success on the field. But something needs to be done to tackle the growing issue of increasingly high player wages because the following figures present an unsustainable picture of excessive spending. Current Premier Little league Winners Manchester City spent 114% of their income on player wages during the 2010-2011 season, with other clubs such as Aston Rental property (103%), Chelsea (84%) and Sunderland (77%) also spending incredible figures on player wages.

I really enjoy seeing the idea of a competitive and capricious Premier Little league generally seems to frighten people, and several arguments have been used to combat such talk. Arguments that can be easily quashed when examined. Arguments citing that a salary cap would discourage the world’s best players from joining Premier Little league teams, well some would claim that the world’s best players don’t play in the Premier Little league anyway (none of the three nominees for the 2012 World Player Of the Year award currently play in the Premier League). Also, in recent years there have been constant calls from various groups of the media suggesting that the increasing number of first class foreign players joining Premier Little league teams is damaging the development of home grown talent and therefore curbing the potential of the English national team. Do fans want to see a monopolised domestic little league or a successful national team?

Introducing salary truck caps will also present awareness of socialism from the outside which is widely considered negative in a western capitalist society. However, American competitive events like the NHL and also the AMERICAN FOOTBAL currently operate with salary truck caps in place. A country that epitomises the sworn adversary of socialism has successfully integrated important components of socialist ideologies into two of a state’s most popular professional sports.

It is obvious that we are a million miles away from implementing any kind of salary cap system in the Premier Little league, but that being said, player wages and financial sustainability are very much part of a current agenda in football. Would any fans like to see the day when a Premier Little league season starts and nobody can predict which teams will ultimately make up the top half of the table? Are Wigan Fitness fans content with their team’s constant struggle for success? Would System fans adore to see a conclusion to their team’s long wait for a trophy? Or are we way too afraid of change and the endless potential of unpredictability?

Leave a reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>